Best CPS 234 Compliance Software Compared

Website: https://www.6clicks.com

Best for: APAC financial services teams and advisors

Starting price: quote only

Free plan: No

Pros: Pre-built CPS 234 framework in the Content Library; Hub and Spoke model for advisors managing many clients

Cons: Pricing is quote only, so budgeting needs a sales conversation; The partner and advisor model may be more than a single in-house team needs

6clicks is the clearest CPS 234 fit in this comparison for Australian teams. The vendor documents a pre-built CPS 234 framework, with APRA information security requirements mapped to controls, alongside ISO 27001, SOC 2, Essential Eight, and IRAP. That matters because CPS 234 is principles based, and a team starting from a blank template must translate each requirement into controls, tests, and evidence on its own. 6clicks also covers CPS 230 third-party assessments.

The platform is built for managed service providers, advisors, and in-house teams that run a full GRC program, with risk registers, audits, vendor risk, incidents, and policy work in one place. The Hub and Spoke model lets an advisor run one hub and many client spokes, which suits firms serving several APRA-regulated clients. Ask for a demo that shows the CPS 234 control set and the 72-hour incident notification process.

Website: https://www.vanta.com

Best for: APRA-regulated teams wanting CPS 234 automation

Starting price: quote only

Free plan: No

Pros: Documented CPS 234 product with pre-built controls and cross-framework mapping; Continuous evidence collection from cloud, identity, and device tools

Cons: Direct pricing is quote only, with no dollar figure on the pricing page; Add-ons and extra frameworks can raise the total cost above the first quote

Vanta is the other vendor in this list with a named CPS 234 product. Its CPS 234 page describes pre-built content and APRA-aligned guidance, continuous evidence collection across cloud, identity, devices, people systems, and vendors, and framework mapping that reuses CPS 234 evidence across ISO 27001, DORA, and NIS 2. The vendor also says it provides APAC-based compliance experts and a locally based customer success team in Australia. Final acceptance always rests with the auditor, because the standard has no formal certification process.

Vanta sells four plans, Essentials, Plus, Professional, and Enterprise. Its pricing page names the plans and asks buyers to request a demo for personalised pricing, with no dollar figure on any plan card. Essentials covers one compliance framework, Plus adds questionnaire automation, and Professional adds risk management and advanced reporting. For CPS 234, ask which plan includes the framework and what the auditor fee will be, because that fee sits outside the subscription.

Website: https://drata.com

Best for: Continuous control monitoring across frameworks

Starting price: quote only

Free plan: No

Pros: Continuous control monitoring and automated evidence collection; Cross-framework control mapping for SOC 2, ISO 27001, and other standards

Cons: Direct pricing is quote only, with no list price on the plans page; CPS 234 coverage needs confirmation in a demo, because Drata presents SOC 2 and ISO 27001 first

Drata is a compliance automation platform that monitors controls around the clock, collects evidence from connected systems, and maps one control set to several frameworks. That model fits CPS 234 well in principle, because the standard asks for security capability that is maintained as threats, vulnerabilities, and information assets change, plus regular testing of control effectiveness. Drata offers Foundation, Advanced, and Enterprise plans, with risk management, vendor risk, asset inventory, personnel tracking, and auditor collaboration.

The limit for an Australian buyer is that Drata does not present CPS 234 as a headline framework in the same way it presents SOC 2 and ISO 27001, so the CPS 234 control set, the CPG 234 guidance, and the incident notification workflow need to be confirmed in a demo. Ask the vendor to show how CPS 234 requirements map to ISO 27001 controls and how control testing is scheduled and evidenced. Also confirm the quote in writing, including the frameworks and the employee band, because direct pricing is quote only.

Website: https://secureframe.com

Best for: Startups and growing teams on a first framework

Starting price: quote only

Free plan: No

Pros: Fundamentals, Complete, and Defense tiers cover startups to federal work; Comply AI questionnaire automation and a Trust Center are included in higher tiers

Cons: No list price is published on the pricing page; No free plan is listed, so a demo and quote are needed before full use

Secureframe is a compliance automation platform for teams working through a first certification and then adding frameworks over time. It sells three packages, Fundamentals, Complete, and Defense. Fundamentals is the entry tier, with one framework, infrastructure monitoring, automated evidence collection, continuous control monitoring, personnel management, risk management, policy management, security awareness training, asset inventory, and a Trust Center. Complete adds advanced third-party risk management, questionnaire automation, SSO and SCIM, and additional workspaces.

For CPS 234, Secureframe is best viewed as a general compliance automation tool that can support the standard through a custom framework, rather than as a dedicated CPS 234 product. The platform covers the building blocks CPS 234 needs, namely asset inventory, control monitoring, policy management, vendor risk, and evidence for audit. Pricing is quote only on the vendor site, built from headcount and framework count, so get a written quote that names the plan and the frameworks.

Website: https://hyperproof.io

Best for: Framework-heavy compliance programs

Starting price: quote only

Free plan: No

Pros: Control mapping across more than 160 frameworks; Hypersync connectors collect evidence from connected systems

Cons: Pricing is quote only, with no public list price; Enterprise focus and setup effort can be heavy for a small first-time team

Hyperproof is a compliance operations platform for teams that manage many frameworks at once. It maps controls across more than 160 frameworks, collects evidence through Hypersync connectors, and links controls to risks, audits, and vendors in one system of record. That breadth suits a regulated entity that must run CPS 234 alongside ISO 27001, SOC 2, CPS 230, and the Privacy Act, because one control test can serve several frameworks when the mapping is set up correctly.

The trade-off is scale. Hyperproof does not publish a list price, and buyers report annual contracts in the five-figure range, with larger multi-framework programs costing more. Setup takes time, because the value comes from mapping controls, connecting systems, and defining tests. A small team with one framework may find a lighter tool faster to start, while a larger team with several frameworks and an internal audit function will get more from Hyperproof.

Website: https://www.strikegraph.com

Best for: Risk-first teams wanting published pricing

Starting price: $21,500 per year

Free plan: Yes

Pros: Published pricing, with Certify from $21,500 per year and a free Launch tier; Risk-first model with risks, controls, and evidence in one place

Cons: CPS 234 is not listed among its Tier 1, 2, or 3 frameworks on the pricing page, so a custom framework is needed; Additional frameworks cost $2,000 to $8,000 per year each

Strike Graph is the only tool in this comparison with a published vendor price that we could open and confirm today. Its pricing page lists Certify from $21,500 per year, Scale from $35,000 per year, and Enterprise on request, with a free Launch tier for basic SOC 2 work. Certify includes a pre-seeded Tier 1 framework, unlimited risks, controls, and evidence, an AI security assistant, audit workbook export, role management, and more than 50 cloud integrations.

The limit for CPS 234 buyers is coverage. The pricing page lists Tier 1 frameworks such as SOC 2, HIPAA, GDPR, and ISO 27701, Tier 2 frameworks such as Essential Eight and ISO 27001, and Tier 3 frameworks such as DORA and NIST 800-53, but CPS 234 is not named in those lists. A CPS 234 program would therefore use a custom framework, with controls mapped from ISO 27001 or built from the CPS 234 requirements directly. Buyers should confirm the custom framework cost before they sign.

Website: https://www.logicgate.com

Best for: Teams building custom risk workflows

Starting price: quote only

Free plan: No

Pros: No-code Risk Cloud applications for risk, controls, audit, and third-party risk; Standard and External Users carry no extra license cost

Cons: Pricing is quote only and modular, so costs rise as applications are added; Building the program needs a dedicated owner and configuration time

LogicGate Risk Cloud is a configurable GRC platform, not a fixed compliance template. Teams use its no-code builder to create applications for enterprise risk, IT risk, third-party risk, controls compliance, internal audit, policy management, and regulatory compliance. That flexibility suits an APRA-regulated entity with a defined CPS 234 process, because the team can build the exact workflow it needs for asset classification, control testing, issue management, and APRA notification.

The cost of that flexibility is configuration. Pricing is quote based and modular, with customers paying for selected applications and Power User licenses, plus optional features and services. Implementation typically takes several weeks to a few months, depending on how many applications are built. A team without a dedicated owner will underuse the platform, so budget for that role as well as the licence.

Website: https://cammsgroup.com

Best for: Australian public sector and APAC regulated teams

Starting price: quote only

Free plan: No

Pros: Australian vendor with strong APAC and public-sector presence; Risk, compliance, audit, and strategy planning in one platform

Cons: Pricing is quote only, with no list price on the vendor site; The focus is broad GRC, so evidence automation for CPS 234 control testing is less central than in compliance automation tools

Camms, now part of Riskonnect, is an Australian GRC vendor with a long presence in government, public sector, and regulated industries across APAC. Its platform links risk management to strategic planning and performance management, with risk registers, compliance obligations, audit, incidents, and reporting in one place. That breadth suits a regulated entity that wants its CPS 234 program tied to enterprise risk and board reporting, rather than run as a separate compliance project.

For CPS 234 specifically, Camms is a broad GRC platform first and a compliance automation tool second. It covers governance, risk, and reporting well, but buyers who want continuous evidence collection, automated control testing, and a pre-built CPS 234 control set should check what is included and what needs configuration. Pricing is quote only, scaled by modules, user count, and deployment complexity.