Project Management by Team · Researched comparison

Best Project Cost Software for Engineering Teams

TaskReports may earn a fee from some links on this page, and some placements are paid and labelled. Neither one decides the order. See our disclosure.

The short answer

Microsoft Project is the top pick for most engineering teams because Plan 3 at $30 per user each month on annual billing pairs resource-driven scheduling with cost tracking, baselines, and the desktop client engineers know. Smartsheet is the best fallback for a team that prefers grids, with Business at $19 per member each month.

On this page

Key takeaways

  • Microsoft Project Plan 3 is $30 per user each month, and it adds the desktop client, resource management, and advanced scheduling to Plan 1.
  • Smartsheet Business is $19 per member each month, and it adds workload, approvals, and 1 TB of storage to cost tracking in grids.
  • Zoho Projects Premium is $4 per user each month, and it is the cheapest option here, with Gantt charts, timesheets, and global budgets on Enterprise.
  • Wrike Business is $25 per user each month, and it adds time tracking, resource management, and approvals to Gantt charts.
  • A team of 10 spends about $480 a year on Zoho Projects Premium, $3,600 on Microsoft Project Plan 3, and $2,280 on Smartsheet Business.

Comparison

How these compare
ToolBest forPrice rangeFree plan
Microsoft ProjectEngineering teams that need resource scheduling$10 per user/month (billed annually)Free trial (30 days)
SmartsheetEngineering teams that plan in grids$9 per user/month (billed annually)Free trial (30 days)
WrikeEngineering teams that need approvals$10 per user/month (billed annually)Yes
MondayEngineering teams that want visual boards$9 per user/month (billed annually)Yes
ClickUpEngineering teams that want one low-cost tool$9 per user/month (billed annually)Yes
AsanaEngineering teams that want structure$10.99 per user/month (billed annually)Yes
TeamworkEngineering teams that bill by the hour$9.99 per user/month (billed annually)Yes
Zoho ProjectsEngineering teams that want the lowest cost$4 per user/month (billed annually)Yes

How we choose

We compared the eight tools on cost tracking depth, price, free plan, and engineering fit. Prices came from each vendor pricing page on 14 November 2026: microsoft.com/microsoft-365/project, smartsheet.com/pricing, wrike.com/pricing, monday.com/pricing, clickup.com/pricing, asana.com/pricing, teamwork.com/pricing, and zoho.com/projects/pricing. We checked which tier includes resource costing, whether baselines and budgets are included, what the free plan covers, and where time tracking sits. We checked vendor docs for feature limits, seat minimums, and trial terms. We did not claim hands-on testing, and we did not use numeric product scores.

Our full method

The shortlist

★ Best overall

Microsoft Project

Best for engineering teams that need resource scheduling

  • resource-driven scheduling with cost rates
  • baselines and earned value on Plan 3
  • desktop client engineers know
Price$10 per user/month (billed annually)
See Microsoft Project pricing

Microsoft Project is the standard for engineering schedules that price work by resource. Plan 1 at $10 per user each month on annual billing covers web-based planning with Gantt charts, dependencies, and timesheets. Plan 3 at $30 adds the desktop client, resource management, advanced scheduling, and program management, which is the tier most engineering teams need. A project manager can set a cost rate per engineer, assign hours to tasks, and see the cost of the schedule change as soon as a date moves. Baselines let the team compare the plan against the actual cost as the work runs.

Plan 5 at $55 added portfolio optimization, but Microsoft ended new purchases of Plan 5 on 1 May 2026, so a new team should plan on Plan 3. There is no permanent free plan, only a 30-day trial, and most teams need 2 to 3 days of formal training per user. For an engineering team that prices work by resource, tracks baselines, and needs a schedule that clients and auditors accept, Microsoft Project is the top pick in this guide.

Price: $10 per user/month (billed annually)

Free plan: Free trial (30 days)

Website: microsoft.com

Watch out for

  • Plan 3 at $30 is the tier most teams need
  • no permanent free plan
  • learning curve is steep
2

Smartsheet

Best for engineering teams that plan in grids
$9 per user/month (billed annually)

Smartsheet fits an engineering team that already plans in spreadsheets. Pro at $9 per member each month on annual billing includes Gantt, board, and calendar views, plus reports and dashboards, and a team can build a budget sheet with formulas that add actual costs against the estimate for each work package. Business at $19 adds workload, approvals, and 1 TB of storage, which covers a team that runs several projects at once. Viewers are free, so a client or a subcontractor can check a sheet without a licence.

Pro covers 1 to 10 members, so a team that grows past 10 licensed members must move to Business at more than twice the per-seat price. Cost tracking needs formulas, since Smartsheet has no built-in resource rate table, and a team must build its own budget template. There is no permanent free plan, only a 30-day trial of Business. For an engineering team that plans in grids, Smartsheet is the most practical pick in this guide.

Price: $9 per user/month (billed annually)

Free plan: Free trial (30 days)

Website: smartsheet.com

What we like

  • budgets and costs in spreadsheet grids
  • Gantt charts with critical path
  • reports and dashboards

Watch out for

  • Pro is capped at 10 members
  • cost features need formulas and setup
3

Wrike

Best for engineering teams that need approvals
$10 per user/month (billed annually)

Wrike suits an engineering team where every design change needs approval before it reaches the budget. Team at $10 per user each month on annual billing includes Gantt charts, board view, dashboards, and integrations, which covers scheduling for a team of 2 to 15 users. Business at $25 adds proofing, approvals, request forms, time tracking, and resource management, which is the tier that turns Wrike into a full delivery system. A request form can take a change request straight into a project, and the approval workflow logs who signed off and when.

Time tracking and resource management sit on Business, so a team that prices work by hours must pay $25 per user, and Business has a 5-seat minimum. The free plan covers unlimited users with basic task lists, which is useful for a trial, but it has no Gantt chart. For an engineering team where approvals and change control are part of every project, Wrike is worth the higher price.

Price: $10 per user/month (billed annually)

Free plan: Yes

Website: wrike.com

What we like

  • Gantt charts on Team
  • resource management on Business
  • proofing and approvals

Watch out for

  • time tracking and resource management need Business at $25
  • Business has a 5-seat minimum
4

Monday

Best for engineering teams that want visual boards
$9 per user/month (billed annually)

Monday gives an engineering team a visual board for every project, with groups for each phase and columns for budget, actual cost, and variance. Basic at $9 per seat each month on annual billing includes the board and the formula column, so a team can track costs per task from the start. Standard at $12 adds timelines, Gantt charts, and 250 automations a month, which covers status changes, due date reminders, and budget alerts for a small team. Pro at $19 raises automations to 25,000 a month and adds time tracking.

Cost tracking on Monday needs formulas, since there is no built-in resource rate table. Monday sells seats in buckets, starting at 3 and then moving in steps of 5, so a team of 4 buys 5 seats and a team of 12 buys 15. The free plan covers up to 2 seats, which suits a trial, not a team. For an engineering team that wants a visual board with a timeline one click away, Monday is the easiest tool in this guide to roll out.

Price: $9 per user/month (billed annually)

Free plan: Yes

Website: monday.com

What we like

  • boards that teams learn fast
  • formulas for cost tracking
  • timelines on Standard

Watch out for

  • Basic has no automations or integrations
  • cost tracking needs formulas and setup
5

ClickUp

Best for engineering teams that want one low-cost tool
$9 per user/month (billed annually)

ClickUp gives an engineering team a low-cost way to track costs with custom fields. Core at $9 per user each month on annual billing includes kanban boards, Gantt charts, custom fields, and unlimited storage, so a team can add a budget field, an actual cost field, and a variance formula to every task. A project can show the schedule on the Gantt view and the costs on a table view, without a second tool. Business at $17 adds workload views, timesheets, and dashboards, which a team needs once it tracks who is overbooked and which project is over budget.

The free plan has no time limit, and it covers basic views with 100 MB of storage. ClickUp packs many views and settings into one screen, so a new user needs a few days to feel at home, and a team should set up project templates before inviting engineers. For an engineering team that wants cost tracking, scheduling, and docs in one low-cost account, ClickUp is the strongest value in this guide.

Price: $9 per user/month (billed annually)

Free plan: Yes

Website: clickup.com

What we like

  • custom fields for cost tracking on every tier
  • Gantt charts on Core
  • free plan with no time limit

Watch out for

  • the range of settings can feel crowded
  • workload and dashboards need Business at $17
6

Asana

Best for engineering teams that want structure
$10.99 per user/month (billed annually)

Asana suits an engineering team that runs the same process on every project. Starter at $10.99 per user each month on annual billing includes Timeline, which is Asana's Gantt view, with dependencies, custom fields, forms, and unlimited automations. A team can build one project template for a design phase, one for a build phase, and one for a handover, then copy it for each new project. Custom fields can hold budget and actual cost per task, and a rule can flag a task when the cost passes the budget. Guests are free, so a client or a subcontractor can see a project without taking a subscription seat.

Advanced at $24.99 adds portfolios, goals, workload, and native time tracking, which a team needs once it manages many projects at once. The free Personal plan covers only two people, so a team of three must move to Starter. For an engineering team that values clean structure and a template library that keeps every project consistent, Asana is a steady choice.

Price: $10.99 per user/month (billed annually)

Free plan: Yes

Website: asana.com

What we like

  • Timeline with dependencies on Starter
  • unlimited free guests
  • templates for repeatable projects

Watch out for

  • Starter has no workload view
  • Advanced at $24.99 is a large jump from Starter
7

Teamwork

Best for engineering teams that bill by the hour
$9.99 per user/month (billed annually)

Teamwork is made for teams that sell hours, and it fits an engineering firm that bills time and materials. Basics at $9.99 per user each month on annual billing includes billable time tracking, unlimited templates, and 5,000 automations, which covers a small team that logs hours against each project. Accelerate at $24.99 adds timesheets, workload planning, retainers, time budgets, and invoicing from logged time, which is the tier that turns tracked hours into client bills. The free plan covers up to 5 users and 5 projects, which is enough for a very small team to start.

Basics has no timesheets and no workload view, so a team that approves hours or plans capacity must move to Accelerate at more than twice the price. Basics also has a 3-seat minimum, so a team of 2 pays for 3 seats. For an engineering firm that bills by the hour and wants time, budgets, and invoices in the same tool as the schedule, Teamwork is the most direct fit in this guide.

Price: $9.99 per user/month (billed annually)

Free plan: Yes

Website: teamwork.com

What we like

  • billable time tracking on Basics
  • retainers and time budgets on Accelerate
  • invoicing from logged time

Watch out for

  • timesheets need Accelerate at $24.99
  • Basics has a 3-seat minimum
8

Zoho Projects

Best for engineering teams that want the lowest cost
$4 per user/month (billed annually)

Zoho Projects is the cheapest way for an engineering team to get a Gantt chart with time tracking. Premium at $4 per user each month on annual billing includes unlimited projects, Gantt charts, timesheets, blueprints, and forms, which is a wide feature set for the lowest price in this guide. The Gantt view supports dependencies and critical path, and the time tracking ties hours to tasks, so a small team can plan and bill from one account. Enterprise at $9 adds custom fields, custom roles, and global budgets, which is still cheap next to the mid tiers of the other tools here. The free plan covers up to 3 users and 2 projects, which suits a founder team.

The interface feels dated next to Monday and Asana. For an engineering team with a tight budget and a need for Gantt charts plus time tracking, Zoho Projects is the clear value pick, and its low price leaves room in the budget for other tools.

Price: $4 per user/month (billed annually)

Free plan: Yes

Website: zoho.com

What we like

  • cheapest subscription tier in this guide
  • Gantt charts and timesheets on Premium
  • free plan for up to 3 users

Watch out for

  • interface feels dated next to Monday and Asana
  • Enterprise at $9 is needed for global budgets

What to check before you buy

Check whether the tool prices work by resource and rate, because a budget field alone cannot show what a design change costs. Microsoft Project is the only tool here with resource rates, baselines, and earned value built in, while the rest need formulas or custom fields to track costs. Ask how the budget updates, because a budget that only updates at month end hides overruns until they are too large to fix.

A common licence mix keeps the bill down: give the project manager Plan 3 at $30, and give the rest of the team Plan 1 at $10 for web updates and timesheets. A team of 10 with 2 managers on Plan 3 and 8 engineers on Plan 1 spends $1,680 a year, against $3,600 if all 10 take Plan 3. Confirm that the trial covers the full cost workflow, not a demo with sample data, and test the baseline view with a live project before you commit.

FAQ

Which cost management tool is best for a small engineering team?

Microsoft Project Plan 3 is the best fit for most engineering teams because it pairs resource-driven scheduling with cost tracking, baselines, and the desktop client at $30 per user each month on annual billing. A team of 10 spends $3,600 a year. Smartsheet Business is the cheaper choice at $19 per member, and it suits a team that prefers grids and reports.

Do I need Plan 3, or is Plan 1 enough?

Plan 1 at $10 is enough for a team member who updates tasks and logs time in the browser. Plan 3 at $30 is the tier a project manager needs, because it adds the desktop client, resource management, advanced scheduling, and baselines. Most teams mix the two, with managers on Plan 3 and engineers on Plan 1, which keeps the bill well below the cost of Plan 3 for everyone.

What is the cheapest cost management tool for engineering teams?

Zoho Projects Premium at $4 per user each month on annual billing is the cheapest in this guide, and it includes Gantt charts, timesheets, and unlimited projects. ClickUp Core and Smartsheet Pro at $9 are the next cheapest. A team of 10 spends $480 a year on Zoho Projects Premium, against $1,080 on ClickUp Core and Smartsheet Pro.

Can a general tool track resource costs?

It can, with setup. ClickUp and Asana use custom fields and formulas to hold rates and hours per task, and Wrike Business has resource management built in. Microsoft Project is the only tool here with resource rates, baselines, and earned value in one system, so a general tool needs a template and a rate table to match that flow.

Which tool shows the critical path for an engineering schedule?

Microsoft Project shows the critical path best in this guide, because Plan 3 includes the full desktop scheduling engine with baselines and resource-driven dates. Smartsheet and Monday also support dependencies and critical path on their Gantt views. Asana Timeline supports dependencies on Starter, which covers most engineering schedules without a higher tier.

Sources we checked

How we score

Need the method behind these picks?

We publish the criteria and the weights, so you can disagree with them.

Microsoft Project#1 PICK
Visit site