Resource Planning and PSA · Researched comparison

Best Resource Planning Software With Time Tracking

TaskReports may earn a fee from some links on this page, and some placements are paid and labelled. Neither one decides the order. See our disclosure.

The short answer

Float is the top pick for most teams. Its visual schedule shows capacity at a glance, and the Pro plan adds time tracking, so planned hours and actual hours sit side by side. Resource Guru is the best low cost option for simple scheduling, while Harvest suits teams that bill by the hour and need budgets tied to time.

On this page

Key takeaways

  • Float leads for visual capacity planning, with time tracking on the Pro plan at $12 per person a month.
  • Resource Guru is the cheapest scheduler here, from $5 per person a month, with timesheets on Blackbelt.
  • Harvest ties time tracking to project budgets, which suits firms that bill clients by the hour.
  • Clockify and Toggl Track cover the basics at low cost, and both offer a free plan for small teams.
  • Monday.com and Asana add workload views to task management, which suits teams that already plan work there.

Comparison

How these compare
ToolBest forPrice rangeFree plan
FloatVisual capacity planning$7 per person/month (billed annually)Free trial (30 days)
Resource GuruSimple scheduling with timesheets$5 per person/monthFree trial (30 days)
HarvestTime tracking tied to budgets$9 per seat/month (billed annually)Free trial (30 days)
Toggl TrackSimple timers for small teams$9 per user/month (billed annually)Yes
ClockifyLow cost tracking and scheduling$3.99 per user/month (billed annually)Yes
TeamworkClient work with workload views$9.99 per user/month (billed annually)Yes
Monday.comVisual boards with workload widgets$9 per seat/month (billed annually)Yes
AsanaTask work with workload and time$10.99 per user/month (billed annually)Yes

How we choose

We compared vendor pricing pages, plan documents and feature lists for each tool, and we checked the entry price and free plan status on the vendor site. We looked for tools that cover both sides of the topic: a capacity or scheduling view and a time record that ties back to it. We left out tools that only schedule or only track time, and we left out tools with no published price and no clear trial. We did not run hands on tests and we did not score the tools, so the order here follows fit for the topic, not a ranking. Prices change, so confirm the figure on the pricing page before you commit.

Our full method

The shortlist

★ Best overall

Float

Best for visual capacity planning for agencies

  • clear visual schedule
  • charges only for scheduled people
Price$7 per person/month (billed annually)
See Float pricing

Float is a scheduling tool first. The schedule shows each person as a row and each project as a bar, with capacity shown as a percentage, so a manager can see at once who is overbooked and who has room. Time off, public holidays and tentative projects sit on the same view, which keeps the plan honest. Pro adds built in time tracking, pre filled timesheets and a desktop timer, plus a comparison of estimated hours against actual hours. That comparison is the part that matters for this list, because it turns the schedule from a plan into a record of what really happened.

Pricing is per scheduled person, not per login, so viewers join free and only people on the schedule count toward the bill. Starter costs $7 per person a month billed annually and covers scheduling, capacity, time off and reporting. Pro costs $12 and adds time tracking, rate cards, cost estimation, advanced reports and single sign on. The main limits are that Float does not invoice clients and does not run full project tasks, so teams that need billing or deep task tracking pair it with another tool.

Price: $7 per person/month (billed annually)

Free plan: Free trial (30 days)

Website: float.com

Watch out for

  • no invoicing
  • time tracking needs the Pro plan
2

Resource Guru

Best for simple team scheduling with timesheets
$5 per person/month

Resource Guru keeps scheduling simple. The booking grid shows people, equipment and meeting rooms in one view, and a booking takes a few seconds to create, move or repeat. Leave management is built in, so holidays and sick days show on the same grid as project work, which stops double booking. Timesheets arrive on the Blackbelt plan, along with reports, custom fields and billable versus non billable time, which is the tier most teams need for this topic. The interface stays plain and fast, with little to learn, so a small team can load its people and projects in an afternoon and start booking the next day.

Pricing changed on July 1, 2026. Grasshopper costs $5 per person a month, Blackbelt $8 and Master $12, with lower rates for rooms, equipment and other non human resources. Annual billing lowers the per person rate further, and the vendor lists the annual figures on its pricing page. The limits are clear: there is no invoicing, no client portal and no built in chat, so finance and client work stay in other tools.

Price: $5 per person/month

Free plan: Free trial (30 days)

Website: resourceguruapp.com

What we like

  • very low entry price
  • fast to set up

Watch out for

  • no invoicing
  • reports start on Blackbelt
3

Harvest

Best for time tracking tied to project budgets
$9 per seat/month (billed annually)

Harvest is a time tracking tool with project budgets at its core. Each project carries a budget in hours or money, and the dashboard shows how much of that budget is used as time is logged, which keeps overruns visible early. Invoices pull directly from tracked time and expenses, so the path from logged hours to a client invoice is short. The tool also tracks team capacity in a light way, with scheduled hours per person per week, which is enough for small teams that plan in broad strokes. Integrations with Asana, Trello, Slack and QuickBooks cover the gaps for teams that plan work elsewhere.

Pricing changed with a 2026 restructuring. The Teams plan costs $9 per seat a month billed annually and the Enterprise plan costs $14, with monthly billing at $11 and $17.50. Flex usage fees apply to active projects, clients, tasks and invoicing on some plans, so the per seat price is not the whole bill for large accounts. There is no free plan, only a 30 day trial, and there is no full resource scheduler, so teams that need detailed capacity planning will want a second tool.

Price: $9 per seat/month (billed annually)

Free plan: Free trial (30 days)

Website: getharvest.com

What we like

  • clean time reports
  • strong invoicing

Watch out for

  • no built in scheduling
  • per seat pricing adds up
4

Toggl Track

Best for simple timers for small teams
$9 per user/month (billed annually)

Toggl Track is the simplest timer on this list. A team member starts a timer with one click, picks a project and a client, and stops it when the work ends, with idle detection to catch forgotten timers. The calendar view and weekly reports show where the hours went, and the tool groups time by project, client and tag, which makes client reporting quick. Scheduling is limited to a team capacity view on higher plans, so Toggl Track suits teams that plan in another tool and only need honest time records here. The mobile and desktop apps work offline and sync later, which matters for people who move between sites.

The free plan covers up to five users with unlimited time tracking, projects and clients, which is enough for a small studio to start. Starter costs $9 per user a month billed annually and adds billable rates, time rounding and saved reports. Premium costs $18 and adds forecasting, team capacity planning and project time estimates, which is the tier that brings real resource planning into the tool.

Price: $9 per user/month (billed annually)

Free plan: Yes

Website: toggl.com

What we like

  • one click timers
  • free plan for small teams

Watch out for

  • weak scheduling
  • reports need a higher plan
5

Clockify

Best for free time tracking with scheduling
$3.99 per user/month (billed annually)

Clockify is the low cost entry on this list, and its free plan has no limit on users, projects or tracked time, which is rare. The timer, manual entry and kiosk modes cover office and field teams, and the calendar, timesheet and report views give managers the basic picture. Scheduling arrived as a separate view where managers assign work and see capacity, and it connects to the time data so planned hours and logged hours can sit side by side. GPS tracking and screenshots are available as add ons for teams that need proof of attendance, and the tool integrates with project tools like Trello, Asana and Jira.

The free plan is genuinely usable, with unlimited users and time tracking, which makes Clockify the default choice for teams with no budget. Basic costs $3.99 per user a month billed annually and adds admin controls, time off and invoicing. Standard costs $5.49 and adds approvals, targets and reminders, while Pro costs $7.99 and adds scheduling, forecasting and single sign on. The limits are that the design is plain, scheduling is not as visual as Float or Resource Guru, and support on the free plan is limited to documentation.

Price: $3.99 per user/month (billed annually)

Free plan: Yes

Website: clockify.me

What we like

  • free plan with no user limit
  • low entry price

Watch out for

  • scheduling is not as visual
  • interface feels plain
6

Teamwork

Best for client work with workload views
$9.99 per user/month (billed annually)

Teamwork is a full project platform with workload planning built in. The workload view shows each person as a bar with assigned hours against capacity, so a manager can spot overload across all active projects at once. Time tracking sits on tasks, with timers, manual entry and timesheets, and billable time flows into invoices through integrations with QuickBooks and Xero. Client work is organised by company and project, with milestones, task lists and file sharing in one place, which suits agencies that run many small client jobs in parallel.

The free plan covers up to five users with basic project features, which is enough to test the workload view on a small team. Basics costs $9.99 per user a month billed annually and adds time tracking, workload and more storage, while Accelerate costs $24.99 and adds resource scheduling, project templates and advanced reporting. The limits are that the interface takes time to learn, the entry plan restricts some reports, and per user pricing climbs fast once the team grows past twenty people.

Price: $9.99 per user/month (billed annually)

Free plan: Yes

Website: teamwork.com

What we like

  • workload views across projects
  • strong client billing

Watch out for

  • learning curve
  • entry plan limits reports
7

Monday.com

Best for visual boards with workload widgets
$9 per seat/month (billed annually)

Monday.com builds work on boards, and the workload widget turns those boards into a capacity view. Each item carries a person, a date range and an effort estimate, and the widget totals the effort per person per week against their capacity, with overload shown in red. Time tracking comes from a time tracking column that logs hours per item, and the dashboard can show planned effort next to logged time. Automations move items, send reminders and update statuses, which cuts the manual work of keeping the board current. The template library covers agency, marketing and software teams, so setup is fast.

The free plan covers up to two seats with basic boards, which suits a tiny team or a trial. Basic costs $9 per seat a month billed annually and adds unlimited items, five gigabytes of storage and a dashboard. Standard costs $12 and adds timelines, calendars and guest access, while Pro costs $19 and adds time tracking, workload views and private boards. The limits are that time tracking is a column rather than a full timesheet system, approvals are light, and the per seat price rises steeply as the team grows.

Price: $9 per seat/month (billed annually)

Free plan: Yes

Website: monday.com

What we like

  • flexible boards
  • workload widget is visual

Watch out for

  • time tracking is basic
  • costs climb with seats
8

Asana

Best for task work with workload and time fields
$10.99 per user/month (billed annually)

Asana is a task platform first, and its workload view is the resource planning layer. Portfolios group projects, and the workload tab shows each person with assigned hours against capacity across all of them, so a manager can rebalance before a deadline slips. Time tracking is native on the Advanced plan, with estimated and actual time fields on tasks, and the dashboard can compare the two. Rules automate handoffs, approvals and status changes, and the tool integrates with Harvest, Clockify and Toggl Track for teams that prefer a dedicated timer.

The free Personal plan covers up to ten collaborators with basic tasks and projects. Starter costs $10.99 per user a month billed annually and adds timeline, dashboard and more guests, while Advanced costs $24.99 and adds workload, native time tracking, approvals and goals. The limits are that real time tracking needs Advanced, the entry plan has no workload view, and reporting on Starter is basic.

Price: $10.99 per user/month (billed annually)

Free plan: Yes

Website: asana.com

What we like

  • workload view is clear
  • strong task management

Watch out for

  • time tracking needs a higher plan
  • reporting is limited on Starter

What to check before you buy

Before you commit, check four things. First, count who counts as a billable seat, because Float charges for scheduled people, Harvest charges per seat and Clockify charges per user, and the same team can cost very different amounts. Second, test the capacity view with your real projects, because a pretty schedule that cannot show leave or tentative work will mislead you. Third, confirm the trial length and whether time data exports, so you can leave with your records if the tool does not fit. Fourth, check invoicing, because several tools here track time but do not invoice, so you may still need an accounting tool.

FAQ

What is the best resource planning software with time tracking?

Float is the best fit for most teams because it plans capacity on a visual schedule and adds time tracking on Pro, so planned and logged hours sit together. Resource Guru is the best low cost option, and Harvest is the best choice for firms that bill by the hour. The right pick depends on team size, budget and whether you need invoicing.

How much does resource planning software with time tracking cost?

Entry prices on this list run from free on Clockify to $12 per person a month for Float Pro, with most tools between $4 and $11 per user a month on annual billing. The monthly bill depends on who counts as a seat, so a 10 person team on Float Pro costs $120 a month, while the same team on Clockify Basic costs $39.90. Always check the pricing page for the current figure.

Can I use a free plan for resource planning and time tracking?

Yes, Clockify, Toggl Track, Teamwork, Monday.com and Asana all offer a free plan, and Clockify has no user limit on its free tier. Free plans usually limit reports, approvals and scheduling depth, so they suit small teams and trials. Float, Resource Guru and Harvest offer a 30 day trial instead of a free plan.

Do I need invoicing in the same tool?

Not always. Harvest and Teamwork connect time records to invoices, while Float and Resource Guru do not invoice at all, so those teams pair the scheduler with an accounting tool. If you bill clients by the hour, pick a tool with invoicing built in or a solid integration, and check whether the integration is on the plan you intend to buy.

What is the difference between capacity planning and scheduling?

Scheduling assigns named work to named people on named dates, while capacity planning checks whether those people have the hours to do it. A good tool does both: it shows the work on a calendar and flags overload before it happens. Time tracking then records what actually happened, so the next plan uses real hours instead of guesses.

Sources we checked

How we score

Need the method behind these picks?

We publish the criteria and the weights, so you can disagree with them.

Float#1 PICK
Visit site